Peer Review Process

  1. The editor-in-chief or an associate editor first evaluates the submitted paper to ensure that it is within the scope of the journal and meets the required quality standards.
  2. If the paper is accepted for peer review, it is then sent to two or more independent reviewers who are experts in the field.
  3. The reviewers assess the paper's originality, significance, and methodological soundness. They also provide feedback to the author on how to improve the paper.
  4. The editor-in-chief then considers the reviewers' feedback and makes a decision on whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the paper.

The JEAS journal uses a double-blind peer review process, which means that the identity of the author is concealed from the reviewers, and the identity of the reviewers is concealed from the author. This helps to ensure that the review process is fair and objective.

The peer review process can take several weeks or even months to complete. However, the JEAS journal strives to provide a timely and efficient review process.

Here are some of the benefits of peer review:

  • It helps to ensure the quality of the research published in the journal.
  • It provides feedback to authors on how to improve their papers.
  • It helps to identify plagiarism and other forms of academic misconduct.
  • It helps to build a community of scholars who are engaged in the process of scientific discovery.